Zum Inhalt springen

Black holes

The Black Hole Information Paradox

Throw a book into a fire and it burns. In principle, its information still sits in the smoke and ash. With a black hole it is different, and that is exactly the problem.

1974 Hawking radiation predicted
1997 Famous bet placed
2004 Hawking concedes

What information means in physics

In physics, information is more than text. It describes the exact state of a system. A basic rule of quantum mechanics says: this state can change but never disappear.

From the present, the past can in theory be reconstructed. So information is indestructible. This was long considered certain.

Where the conflict arises

Stephen Hawking showed in 1974 that black holes slowly evaporate through Hawking radiation. This radiation seemed purely random and to carry no information.

If the black hole finally disappears, the information would be gone. That puts Hawking’s calculation against quantum physics. Both cannot be right at once.

The famous bet of the physicists

How serious the clash was shows in a bet from 1997. Stephen Hawking and Kip Thorne argued for information loss, while John Preskill bet on its survival. The stake was an encyclopedia.

In 2004 Hawking conceded and admitted Preskill was right. He handed over a baseball encyclopedia, from which information is easy to retrieve. The move was seen as a turning point in the debate.

Possible ways out

Many physicists now suspect information is preserved after all. Perhaps it is finely encoded in the radiation. Perhaps it sits at the edge of the black hole, as the holographic principle suggests.

There is no complete answer. But this very clash drives research toward a deeper theory.

What the radiation curve might reveal

In recent years the so-called Page curve moved into focus. It describes how information should leak back out during evaporation if quantum physics holds true.

New calculations using methods from string theory actually produce this curve. Many see it as strong evidence that the information escapes in the end after all.

Why the paradox matters so much

It links gravity, quantum physics and information in a single question. That places it at the center of the idea of information as reality, the thread running through cosmosfrombit.

Whoever solves the paradox may unite the two great theories of physics. That is exactly why it counts as one of the most important open problems of all.

Frequently asked questions

What is the information paradox in short?

It is the conflict between two rules: quantum physics forbids the loss of information, yet an evaporating black hole seemed to destroy it.

Is the paradox solved?

Not finally. Many physicists now think information is preserved after all, perhaps encoded at the edge of the black hole. A complete theory is still missing.

What does information mean in physics?

It describes the exact state of a system. A basic rule of quantum physics says this state can change but never be lost.

Why did the information seem to be lost?

Because a black hole evaporates through Hawking radiation. This radiation seemed purely random and to carry no information. If the hole vanishes entirely, the information would be gone.

What was the Hawking-Preskill bet?

In 1997 Hawking and Thorne bet that information is lost, Preskill bet against it. In 2004 Hawking conceded and admitted Preskill was right, a turning point in the debate.

Why does the paradox matter so much?

It links gravity, quantum physics and information in one question. Whoever solves it may unite the two great theories of physics.

Sources and further reading

Update note (as of: 06/02/2026)

First publication of the information paradox article.

The cosmos in your inbox

Once a week: the best of the universe, made simple.

What interests you?

Double opt-in. Unsubscribe anytime. · Privacy